Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper focuses on the Gulzār-i ḥāl by Banwālīdās (1662–3), a Persian adaptation of the Sanskrit allegorical drama Prabodhacandrodaya composed by Kṛṣṇamiśra (not long after 1065). It is also hypothesised that Banwālīdās may have used a Braj Bhāṣā version of the same text – by the poet Nanddās entitled Prabodhacandrodaya Nāṭaka (c. 1570) –, as intermediary with the original Sanskrit. Regardless of the source that our author used to realise his Gulzār-i ḥāl , the filter used to adapt Advaitic elements to the Islamic mystical context was the Waḥdat al-Wujūd (“Unity of Being”), or the tradition of mysticism that was heavily inspiring Sufi traditions of South Asia at that time. Moreover, a codicological analysis of the Gulzār-i ḥāl ’s manuscript tradition has brought to light that both Hindu and Muslim readership received the text. In this paper, I will show that the interpretative engagement of Banwālīdās carried on a tradition of philosophical studies that did not consider Sufi and Vedāntic metaphysics as separated entities but as elements that – in dialogue with each other – searched for a common answer to the ultimate truth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giuseppe Cappello (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: