Key result
Partial revascularization plus cardiac rehab improves 1-year walking distance and QoL versus complete revascularization.
Why the study?
The study aimed to observe the effect and explore the possible mechanism of cardiac rehabilitation in patients undergoing partial revascularization for multiple coronary artery lesions.
Does partial revascularization combined with cardiac rehabilitation improve exercise endurance, quality of life, and biomarker profiles compared to complete revascularization in patients with multiple coronary artery lesions?
RCT (n=400)
Does partial revascularization combined with cardiac rehabilitation improve exercise endurance, quality of life, and biomarker profiles compared to complete revascularization in patients with multiple coronary artery lesions?
Partial revascularization followed by cardiac rehabilitation improves exercise capacity, quality of life, and endothelial/antioxidant biomarkers compared to complete revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary disease, without increasing adverse events.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports partial revascularization plus cardiac rehabilitation for better functional outcomes in multivessel disease; extends RCT comparisons of revascularization completeness.
Purpose: To observe the effect of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in patients with partial revascularization performed on multiple coronary artery lesions and explore its possible mechanism. Patients and Methods: A total of 400 patients with multiple coronary artery lesions were enrolled and randomly divided into a complete revascularization group and a CR group, with 200 cases in each group. Target lesion revascularization was performed radically in the complete revascularization group, while it was partially completed in the CR group, and postoperative CR was performed. All the patients were put under conventional treatment. Left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVEDD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 6-minute walking distance (6-MWD), quality-of-life scores, safety and levels of serum nitric oxide (NO), nitric oxide synthase (NOS), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were evaluated and compared between two groups before and after training. Results: There was no significant difference in LVEDD, LVEF, 6-MWD, quality-of-life scores, levels of serum NO, NOS, SOD, and VEGF between two groups before training ( p > 0.05). 1 year later, compared with the complete revascularization group, the occurrence of major adverse events in the CR group declined ( p > 0.05); the measurements of LVEDD decreased and LVEF increased ( p > 0.05), 6-MWD increased significantly ( p < 0.05), quality-of-life scores were higher ( p < 0.05), the levels of serum NO, NOS, and SOD increased noticeably, and the levels of serum VEGF decreased significantly in the CR group ( p < 0.05). There were significant differences within the same group, before and after training ( p < 0.05). Conclusion: Cardiac rehabilitation training, not increase in the incidence of adverse events, is effective and safe after partial revascularization in patients with multiple coronary artery lesions, which has notable clinical advantages in promoting patients’ exercise endurance and quality-of-life by improving the nitric oxide synthase system and antioxidant system and reducing the level of VEGF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Multiple coronary artery lesions (n=400). Partial revascularization with postoperative cardiac rehabilitation vs. Complete revascularization was evaluated on LVEDD, LVEF, 6-MWD, quality-of-life scores, safety, and serum biomarkers (NO, NOS, SOD, VEGF) (p=<0.05). Partial revascularization with cardiac rehabilitation significantly increased 6-minute walking distance and quality-of-life scores compared to complete revascularization at 1 year (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: