This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: Young women (≤40 years at diagnosis) with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer (EBC) represent a high-risk group with distinct biological features. Conventional biomarkers, such as Ki67 and immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based subtypes, are not validated in this population. This study assessed the prognostic value of clinical and genomic biomarkers and explored age-related clinicopathological and gene expression differences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 658 patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative EBC who underwent genomic risk testing between 2015 and 2023 at a single institution was analyzed. Patients were stratified by age at diagnosis: ≤40 years (n = 81), 41-50 years (n = 232), and >50 years (n = 345). Clinical data, treatments, and outcomes were assessed. Prediction Analysis of Microarray 50/Prosigna was used to determine intrinsic subtypes and risk of recurrence (ROR); The Cancer Genome Atlas data were used for validation. Survival analyses included Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, and Cox models. RESULTS: Young patients at diagnosis (age ≤40 years) had more locally advanced tumors, higher Ki67, and a greater prevalence of luminal B subtype. Clinical and IHC markers poorly predicted ROR; notably, 50% of Ki67 <10% tumors in young women were ROR high-risk. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) was lower in young patients (82.8%) compared with older groups (90.5% and 92.8%, respectively; P = 0.042). Among IHC luminal A-like tumors, young age was associated with increased recurrence risk [hazard ratio (HR) 5.75, P < 0.001]. ROR score was independently prognostic in young women (HR 3.12, P = 0.004). Gene expression revealed lower estrogen-related and higher basal-like gene levels in younger patients. CONCLUSION: Young women with ER-positive, HER2-negative EBC have poorer outcomes. Ki67, in particular, is a poor prognostic marker in this group. Genomic profiling improves risk stratification and highlights unique tumor biology, supporting personalized treatment strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walbaum et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: