Key result
Bioactive polymers and resorbable stents offer distinct trade-offs shaping the future of PCI.
Why the study?
Stents revolutionized CAD care, but their long-term effects have prompted ongoing evolution, motivating an examination of different stent polymers to determine what future stents may consist of.
This review outlines the technological evolution of coronary stents and the potential of bioactive polymers in developing the ideal future stent.
Clinicians should await randomized data before considering bioactive stents; this review leaves open optimal polymer selection for future devices.
Coronary heart disease remains one of the leading causes of death in most countries. Healthcare improvements have seen a shift in the presentation of disease with a reducing number of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs), largely due to earlier reperfusion strategies such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Stents have revolutionized the care of these patients, but the long-term effects of these devices have been brought to the fore. The conceptual and technologic evolution of these devices from bare-metal stents led to the creation and wide application of drug-eluting stents; further research introduced the idea of polymer-based resorbable stents. We look at the evolution of stents and the multiple advantages and disadvantages offered by each of the different polymers used to make stents in order to identify what the stent of the future may consist of whilst highlighting properties that are beneficial to the patient alongside the role of the surgeon, the cardiologist, engineers, chemists, and biophysicists in creating the ideal stent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nappi et al. (2021) conducted a review in Coronary heart disease. Bioactive polymers and polymer-based resorbable stents was evaluated. Bioactive polymers and polymer-based resorbable stents offer various advantages and disadvantages that will shape the future of percutaneous coronary intervention and cardiovascular therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: