Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this article, I argue that Paulo Freire's liberatory conception of education is interesting, challenging, even transforming because central to it are important aspects of education which other philosophers marginalise. I also argue that Freire's critics are right when they claim that he paid insufficient attention to another important aspect of education. Finally, I argue for a conception of education which takes account of the strengths and at the same time overcomes the limitations of Freire's liberatory conception.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kelvin Beckett (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: