Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose The empirical research of e-government at the local level has been the subject of many studies in the last two decades. The evidence collected by those studies constitutes a relevant opportunity toward the development of a theory of local e-government implementation. However, several synthesis efforts are needed before such a theory can be developed. The purpose of this article is to contribute to that endeavor by proposing an empirical model of the determinants of e-government implementation by local governments. Design/methodology/approach The empirical model results from the systematic revision of 59 primary studies published in scientific journals, between 2002 and 2018. As a starting point, a conceptual map relating concepts such as readiness, diffusion, adoption, implementation and institutionalization is presented. Findings There is a common set of determinants that explains local e-government implementation in general, and three other sets of determinants that contribute to differentiate each one of three e-government dimensions: e-participation, e-transparency and e-services. Research limitations/implications Because it was found that different determinants are associated with different e-government dimensions, future empirical studies should differentiate between those dimensions when studying local government. Originality/value This is the first study to attempt a synthesis effort on the determinants of e-government implementation by local governments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gonçalo Paiva Dias (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: