PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2015The Economic Journal194 citationsOpen Access

Longitudinal Evidence for a Midlife Nadir in Human Well‐Being: Results from Four Data Sets

View Full Paper
TCTerence Chai ChengNPNattavudh PowdthaveeAOAndrew J. Oswald

Key Points

  • This research investigates whether a U-shaped pattern exists in human well-being through longitudinal data analysis.
  • Utilized four different data sets to analyze within-person changes in well-being.
  • Developed a new test without relying on formal regression equations.
  • Employed first-derivative properties of a well-being equation to support findings.
  • Strong evidence confirms a U shape in well-being over time, revealing a midlife nadir.
  • Findings challenge the notion that the U-shape is merely a statistical artifact.

Abstract

There is a large amount of cross-sectional evidence for a midlife low in the life cycle of human happiness and well-being (a 'U shape'). Yet no genuinely longitudinal inquiry has uncovered evidence for a U-shaped pattern. Thus, some researchers believe the U is a statistical artefact. We re-examine this fundamental cross-disciplinary question. We suggest a new test. Drawing on four data sets, and only within-person changes in well-being, we document powerful support for a U shape in longitudinal data (without the need for formal regression equations). The article's methodological contribution is to use the first-derivative properties of a well-being equation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cheng et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1724d0c23c548e2a7bcb45https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12256
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper