Key result
Neural networks using baseline echo data predict progressive myocardial dysfunction in moderate AS with 93% accuracy.
Why the study?
Moderate aortic stenosis can lead to adverse outcomes comparable to severe aortic stenosis, but factors associated with progressive myocardial dysfunction are not well described.
Does artificial neural network analysis predict progressive subclinical myocardial dysfunction in patients with moderate aortic stenosis?
Observational (n=66)
No
Does artificial neural network analysis predict progressive subclinical myocardial dysfunction in patients with moderate aortic stenosis?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.997
Artificial neural networks using baseline echocardiographic metrics can accurately predict progressive subclinical myocardial dysfunction in moderate aortic stenosis, highlighting the importance of peak gradient, dimensionless index, and energy loss.
May support ANN risk stratification in moderate AS; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Background: Moderate severity aortic stenosis (AS) is poorly understood, is associated with subclinical myocardial dysfunction, and can lead to adverse outcome rates that are comparable to severe AS. Factors associated with progressive myocardial dysfunction in moderate AS are not well described. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) can identify patterns, inform clinical risk, and identify features of importance in clinical datasets. Methods: We conducted ANN analyses on longitudinal echocardiographic data collected from 66 individuals with moderate AS who underwent serial echocardiography at our institution. Image phenotyping involved left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) and valve stenosis severity (including energetics) analysis. ANNs were constructed using two multilayer perceptron models. The first model was developed to predict change in GLS from baseline echocardiography alone and the second to predict change in GLS using data from baseline and serial echocardiography. ANNs used a single hidden layer architecture and a 70%:30% training/testing split. Results: Over a median follow-up interval of 1.3 years, change in GLS (≤ or >median change) could be predicted with accuracy rates of 95% in training and 93% in testing using ANN with inputs from baseline echocardiogram data alone (AUC: 0.997). The four most important predictive baseline features (reported as normalized % importance relative to most important feature) were peak gradient (100%), energy loss (93%), GLS (80%), and DI < 0.25 (50%). When a further model was run including inputs from both baseline and serial echocardiography (AUC 0.844), the top four features of importance were change in dimensionless index between index and follow-up studies (100%), baseline peak gradient (79%), baseline energy loss (72%), and baseline GLS (63%). Conclusions: Artificial neural networks can predict progressive subclinical myocardial dysfunction with high accuracy in moderate AS and identify features of importance. Key features associated with classifying progression in subclinical myocardial dysfunction included peak gradient, dimensionless index, GLS, and hydraulic load (energy loss), suggesting that these features should be closely evaluated and monitored in AS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Namasivayam et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Moderate severity aortic stenosis (n=66). Artificial neural network (ANN) models was evaluated on Prediction of change in global longitudinal strain (≤ or > median change) using baseline echocardiogram data (AUC 0.997). Artificial neural networks using baseline echocardiogram data alone predicted progressive subclinical myocardial dysfunction with 93% testing accuracy (AUC 0.997) in moderate aortic stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: