Why the study?
Routine EF measurement is insensitive to subtle myocardial changes in aortic stenosis, and only GLS among STE parameters is currently guided due to a lack of robustness.
Does a machine-learning model using layer-specific STE parameters improve the automatic classification of severe aortic stenosis compared to EF and conventional GLS?
Does a machine-learning model using layer-specific STE parameters improve the automatic classification of severe aortic stenosis compared to EF and conventional GLS?
A novel machine-learning model utilizing layer-specific speckle-tracking echocardiography parameters demonstrates superior diagnostic accuracy for classifying severe aortic stenosis compared to conventional ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain.
The timing of valvular manipulation in aortic stenosis (AS) is challenging for asymptomatic patients and is based on reduced ejection fraction (EF). The routinely echocardiographic EF measurement is insensitive to subtle myocardial changes and is also dependent on left ventricular (LV) geometry. Various speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) derived parameters were found valuable for detecting early LV dysfunction in AS, but only the global longitudinal strain (GLS) is guided due to a lack of robustness. We propose a novel machine-learning-based model, trained over global layer-specific STE parameters for automatic classification of AS. The dataset includes 82 AS patients with severe stenosis, 96 chest pain subjects, and 319 healthy volunteers. The proposed model outperformed with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97 for separating between AS patients and healthy volunteers, compared to 0.88 and 0.82 for EF and conventional GLS, respectively. For separating between AS patients and chest pain subjects, the model’s AUC was 0.95, compared to 0.9 and 0.55 for EF and conventional GLS, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yahav et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: