Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Lower-tier firms are less competitive than tier-one firms in many areas of the South African automotive industry. One of the reasons for low operational competitiveness and productivity can be attributed to the knowledge and problem-solving skills of employees. There are many training programmes for lower-tier firms to improve their productivity. The quality control (QC) story problem-solving methodology, together with the combination of classroom and onsite training is effective in improving productivity. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of Kaizen practices and training on productivity improvement. The study investigated the relationships between the QC story problem-solving, the consultants’ capability, and productivity improvement. Setting: The study was conducted with 20 lower-tier firms in the automotive sector in South Africa, which received basic Kaizen training from trained consultants between 2022 and 2023. Method: The study was quantitative and a survey questionnaire was used to collect the firm’s data before and after the training interventions. Assessments were conducted on consultants focussing on training capability and practical implementation capability. Results: The results of the study showed that the QC story problem-solving method is efficacious in improving productivity within automotive firms at all tier levels. The capability of the consultant showed a correlation with the improvement of the firm’s productivity. Conclusion: The QC story problem-solving method is a successful approach to improving productivity in automotive firms. The improvement ratio, however, showed short-term impact, which was measured at the end of the Kaizen intervention. It is necessary to examine the long-term impact of such interventions to understand sustainability. Contribution: The effectiveness of the QC story problem-solving methodology in conjunction with classroom and on-site training to increase productivity is demonstrated by this empirical investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pillay et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: