Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this review article we discuss a number of recent results concerning wild weak solutions of the incompressible Euler and Navier–Stokes equations. These results build on the groundbreaking works of De Lellis and Székelyhidi Jr., who extended Nash’s fundamental ideas on C^1 flexible isometric embeddings, into the realm of fluid dynamics. These techniques, which go under the umbrella name convex integration , have fundamental analogies with the phenomenological theories of hydrodynamic turbulence [51,54,55,200]. Mathematical problems arising in turbulence(such as the Onsager conjecture) have not only sparked new interest in convex integration, but certain experimentally observed features of turbulent flows (such as intermittency) have also informed new convex integration constructions. First, we give an elementary construction of nonconservative C⁰⁺x,t weak solutions of the Euler equations, first proven by De Lellis–Székelyhidi Jr. [52,53]. Second, we present Isett’s [108] recent resolution of the flexible side of the Onsager conjecture. Here, we in fact follow the joint work [21] of De Lellis–Székelyhidi Jr. and the authors of this paper, in which weak solutions of the Euler equations in the regularity class C1/3-x,t are constructed, attaining any energy profile. Third, we give a concise proof of the authors’ recent result [23], which proves the existence of infinitely many weak solutions of the Navier–Stokes in the regularity class C^0_t L²⁺_x ∩ C^0_t W1,1+_x . We conclude the article by mentioning a number of open problems at the intersection of convex integration and hydrodynamic turbulence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buckmaster et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: