Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and computer vision technologies are increasingly integrated into educational environments through intelligent tutoring systems, gesture-based learning, facial expression analysis, and automated evaluation tools. However, selecting the most appropriate image recognition algorithms for educational applications remains a challenge due to varying requirements regarding speed, accuracy, hardware compatibility, and usability in dynamic classroom conditions.This paper proposes a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model based on the Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and Net Worth Analysis (NWA) methods to evaluate and rank nine widely used AI-based visual recognition algorithms. The evaluation is conducted using five education-relevant criteria: processing speed, recognition accuracy, robustness to classroom noise, compatibility with low-end devices, and energy efficiency. Expert assessments from the field of educational technology were used to derive weight coefficients and evaluate algorithm performance.The results show that Fast R-CNN achieved the highest overall score (1.141), followed by U-Net (1.077) and DeepLab (1.062), indicating their suitability for real-time and resource-constrained EdTech environments. Algorithms such as MobileNet (1.057) and YOLO (1.037) also demonstrated balanced performance, making them viable for mobile or moderately demanding educational scenarios. The proposed model offers a structured and transparent decision-support framework that can assist researchers and practitioners in selecting optimal AI algorithms for diverse educational applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gligorijević et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: