Key result
AliveCor single-lead ECG feasibly monitors 37 patients with fast AF without requiring 12-lead ECGs.
Why the study?
Single-lead ECGs have been proposed as a more convenient alternative to 12-lead ECGs, but the feasibility of using the AliveCor monitor for AF diagnosis and monitoring in the community needed evaluation.
Does the AliveCor single-lead ECG monitor provide a feasible alternative for diagnosis and monitoring of atrial fibrillation in patients requiring ECG follow-up or confirmation in the community?
Observational (n=74)
Does the AliveCor single-lead ECG monitor provide a feasible alternative for diagnosis and monitoring of atrial fibrillation in patients requiring ECG follow-up or confirmation in the community?
Single-lead ECG monitoring with AliveCor is a feasible and cost-saving alternative to 12-lead ECGs for community-based AF diagnosis and management.
May support single-lead ECG for community AF monitoring; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Community management of atrial fibrillation (AF) often requires the use of electrocardiographic (ECG) investigation. Patients discharged following treatment of AF with fast ventricular response (fast AF) can require numerous ECGs to monitor rate and/or rhythm control. Single-lead ECGs have been proposed as a more convenient and relatively accurate alternative to 12-lead ECGs for rate/rhythm management and also diagnosis of AF. We aimed to examine the feasibility of using the AliveCor single-lead ECG monitor for diagnosis and monitoring of AF in the community setting. METHODS: During the course of 6 months, this evaluation of a clinical service improvement pathway used the AliveCor in management of patients requiring (1) follow-up ECGs for AF with previously documented rapid ventricular rate or (2) ECG confirmation of rhythm where AF was suspected. Twelve AliveCor devices provided to the acute community medical team were used to produce 30 s ECG rhythm strips (iECG) that were electronically sent to an overreading physician. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients (mean age 82 years) were managed on this pathway. (1) The AliveCor was successfully used to monitor the follow-up of 37 patients with fast AF, acquiring a combined total of 113 iECGs (median 1.5 ±3.75 per patient). None of these patients required a subsequent 12-lead ECG and this approach saved an estimate of up to £134.49 per patient. (2) Of 53 patients with abnormal pulses, the system helped identify 8 cases of new onset AF and 19 cases of previously known AF that had reverted from sinus back into AF. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that the AliveCor system is a feasible, cost-effective, time-efficient and potentially safer alternative to serial 12-lead ECGs for community monitoring and diagnosis of AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bray et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=74). AliveCor single-lead ECG monitor vs. 12-lead ECGs was evaluated on Feasibility of using the AliveCor single-lead ECG monitor for diagnosis and monitoring of AF. The AliveCor single-lead ECG system successfully monitored 37 patients with fast AF without requiring subsequent 12-lead ECGs, and identified 27 cases of new or recurrent AF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: