Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article argues a case for reconsidering positive discrimination as a viable and necessary policy intervention to speed up the progression to equality in the workplace. It provides counter-arguments to the four main objections to positive discrimination: the failure to select the ‘best’ candidate, the undermining of meritocracy, the negative impact on the beneficiaries and the injustice of reverse discrimination. It concludes that positive discrimination provides the necessary structural conditions in order for radical, transformative change towards equality to take place.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mike Noon (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: