Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article presents a review of the tests that are used for functional communication assessment of people with poststroke aphasia. Since formal language assessment has been found to be insufficient for predicting a patient’s communicative success in daily life, the focus of rehabilitation has switched to communicative skills. Based on the literature, we define four types of instruments: clinician-rated observational profiles, patient/proxy-rated observational profiles, tests that imitate everyday scenarios and tests that assess a person’s spontaneous speech during an interview, discussion on a given topic or retelling a story. Each approach has its own goals and methodology. Advantages and disadvantages of the different types of functional communication assessment are discussed
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pozdniakova et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: