Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
IT was shown by us in a previous communication [1929] that, contrary to the usually accepted view, the action of Merulius lachrymans (the fungus respon- sible for dry-rot) on wood was to destroy the. major part of the cellulose fraction of the lignocellulose complex and to leave the lignin component unaffected. It was found that the so-called hemicelluloses, which are present in woody tissues, were also resistant to fungal attack, whereas the hexosans, mannan and galactan were completely destroyed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barton-Wright et al. (1931) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: