Key result
Larger stenotic coronary artery diameters linked to increased ischemia risk.
Why the study?
The effect of coronary arterial diameter derived from coronary computed tomography angiography on fractional flow reserve remained to be explored.
Does coronary arterial diameter affect fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with moderate coronary artery stenosis?
Observational (n=131)
Does coronary arterial diameter affect fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with moderate coronary artery stenosis?
Larger diameter coronary vessels with moderate stenosis are associated with faster flow rate changes and are more prone to ischemia (lower FFR) compared to smaller diameter vessels.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Larger vessel diameter may influence FFR in moderate stenosis; leaves open whether diameter-adjusted thresholds should guide decisions.
Background Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is considered to be the criterion standard for the clinical diagnosis of functional myocardial ischemia. In this study, we explored the effect of the coronary arterial diameter derived from coronary computed tomography angiography on FFR. Method We retrospectively reviewed the clinical information of 131 patients with moderate coronary artery stenosis. To compare the mean diameter of stenotic vessels, patients were divided into ischemic and nonischemic groups. According to the clinical statistics of the diameter of the ischemic group and the nonischemic group, we established 8 ideal models of coronary artery diameter of 4 mm (40%, 50%, 60%, and 70% stenosis) and diameter of 3 mm (40%, 50%, 60%, and 70% stenosis). Two sets of numerical simulation experiments were carried out: experiment 1 evaluated the variation rate of CT-based computation of non-invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR CT ) with vessel diameters of 4 mm and 3 mm under different stenosis rates, and experiment 2 explored the variation of FFR CT with vessel diameters of 4 mm and 3 mm under different cardiac outputs. We simulated changes in the flow of narrow blood vessels by changes in cardiac output. Results According to clinical statistics, the mean ± SD diameter of stenotic vessels in the ischemic and nonischemic groups was 3.67 ± 0.77 mm and 3.31 ± 0.64 mm ( P < 0.05 for difference), respectively. In experiment 1, the FFR CT of coronary with a diameter of 4 mm was 0.86, 0.80, 0.66, and 0.35, and that with a diameter of 3 mm was 0.90, 0.84, 0.71, and 0.50, respectively. In experiment 2, the FFR CT of the coronary vessel diameter of 4 mm was 0.84, 0.80, 0.76, and 0.72, respectively. The FFR CT coronary vessels with a diameter of 3 mm were 0.87, 0.84, 0.80, and 0.76, respectively. Conclusions As the stenosis increases, compared with narrow blood vessel of small diameter, the narrow blood vessel with larger diameter is accompanied by faster flow rate changes and is more prone to ischemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2022) conducted an observational in moderate coronary artery stenosis (n=131). Coronary arterial diameter derived from CCTA vs. Nonischemic group / smaller diameter vessels was evaluated on Mean diameter of stenotic vessels in ischemic vs nonischemic groups (p=<0.05). Larger coronary arterial diameters were more prone to ischemia, with mean stenotic vessel diameters of 3.67 mm in ischemic versus 3.31 mm in nonischemic groups (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: