Key result
Algorithm correcting activation mapping errors eliminates 100% of atrial tachycardias at the origin site.
Why the study?
Post-ablation ATs feature low-voltage signals that challenge current mapping methods, prompting analysis of mapping errors to establish a strategy for correctly interpreting tachycardia mechanisms.
Does a specific mapping strategy algorithm improve the interpretation of unclear activation maps and facilitate successful ablation in patients with post-ablation atrial tachycardias?
Observational (n=31)
Does a specific mapping strategy algorithm improve the interpretation of unclear activation maps and facilitate successful ablation in patients with post-ablation atrial tachycardias?
A proposed mapping algorithm helps identify and correct common activation mapping errors in post-ablation atrial tachycardias, facilitating successful ablation.
May facilitate ablation of post-ablation ATs with unclear maps; leaves open need for prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Post-ablation atrial tachycardias (ATs) are characterized by low-voltage signals that challenge current mapping methods. In this study, we analyzed common mistakes during activation mapping and delineated a mapping strategy for correct interpretation of tachycardia mechanisms in patients with challenging underlying substrate. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-one patients referred for AT ablation were selected for the study. Three types of incorrect activation patterns were identified, which were referred to as unrecognized block line (pseudo-macroreentry and pseudo-fig-8 reentry), incorrect activation timing window of interest (WOI) (chaotic activation), and mis-annotation of complex signals (multiple sites of "early meets late"). Pseudo-macroreentry and chaotic activation occur in focal or localized reentry AT with the error related to the WOI selection (four cases), incorrect annotation of local activation time (six cases), or a previous line of atrial block in (seven cases). Pseudo-fig-8 reentry (five cases) and multiple sites of "early meets late" (nine cases) occur in macroreentrant AT with blocked areas and low-voltage atrial substrate. All ATs were successfully eliminated at the origin site. CONCLUSIONS: We delineated a series of ATs in the setting of a disordered pattern of activation mapping encountered in patients after previous extensive ablation or atriotomy. The algorithm proposed rapidly corrects the activation map and identifies the mechanism of the AT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Post-ablation atrial tachycardias (n=31). Activation mapping algorithm was evaluated on Successful elimination of atrial tachycardias at the origin site. An algorithm to correct activation mapping errors successfully identified the tachycardia mechanism and eliminated all atrial tachycardias at the origin site in 31 patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: