Key result
Combining entrainment with high-resolution activation mapping diagnoses 100% of gap-related AT post-AF ablation.
Why the study?
Incomplete understanding of the mechanism of atrial tachycardia is a major determinant of ablation failure.
Does high-resolution activation mapping combined with high-density voltage and entrainment mapping improve the diagnosis of endocardial gap-related atrial tachycardias post-AF ablation?
Cohort (n=107)
Does high-resolution activation mapping combined with high-density voltage and entrainment mapping improve the diagnosis of endocardial gap-related atrial tachycardias post-AF ablation?
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 83.6%
The combination of high-resolution activation mapping with high-density voltage and entrainment mapping allows for 100% diagnostic success in delineating the critical circuit of endocardial gap-related re-entrant atrial tachycardias after AF ablation.
May aid gap-related AT diagnosis post-AF ablation; leaves open impact on outcomes pending prospective trials.
AIMS: An incomplete understanding of the mechanism of atrial tachycardia (AT) is a major determinant of ablation failure. We systematically evaluated the mechanisms of AT using ultra-high-resolution mapping in a large cohort of patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 107 consecutive patients (mean age: 65.7 ± 9.2 years, males: 81 patients) with documented endocardial gap-related AT after left atrial ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). We analysed the mechanism of 134 AT (94 macro-re-entries and 40 localized re-entries) using high-resolution activation mapping in combination with high-density voltage and entrainment mapping. Voltage in the conducting channels may be extremely low, even <0.1 mV (0.14 ± 0.095 mV, 51 of 134 AT, 41%), and almost always <0.5 mV (0.03-0.5 mV, 133 of 134 AT, 99.3%). The use of multipolar Orion, HDGrid, and Pentaray catheters improved our accuracy in delineating ultra-low-voltage areas critical for maintenance of the circuit of endocardial gap-related AT. Conventional ablation catheters often do not detect any signal (noise level) even using adequate contact force, and only multipolar catheters of small electrodes and shorter interelectrode space can detect clear fractionated low-amplitude and high frequency signals, critical for re-entry maintenance. We performed a diagnosis in 112 out of 134 AT (83.6%) using only activation mapping and in 134 out of 134 AT (100%) using the combination of activation and entrainment mapping. CONCLUSION: High-resolution activation mapping in combination with high-density voltage and entrainment mapping is the ideal strategy to delineate the critical part of the circuit in endocardial gap-related re-entrant AT after AF ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vlachos et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Endocardial gap-related atrial tachycardia post-AF ablation (n=107). High-resolution activation mapping combined with high-density voltage and entrainment mapping vs. Activation mapping alone was evaluated on Diagnosis of atrial tachycardia mechanism. High-resolution activation mapping combined with entrainment mapping successfully diagnosed 100% of gap-related atrial tachycardias post-AF ablation, compared to 83.6% with activation mapping alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: