Key result
Noninvasive 3D activation recovery interval imaging showed an average correlation coefficient of 0.86±0.05 and localization error of 4.5±2.3 mm compared to invasive CARTO endocardial mapping.
Why the study?
Does noninvasive 3D ARI imaging accurately reconstruct ventricular repolarization patterns compared to invasive CARTO mapping in patients with PVCs?
Observational (n=10)
Does noninvasive 3D ARI imaging accurately reconstruct ventricular repolarization patterns compared to invasive CARTO mapping in patients with PVCs?
Noninvasive 3D ARI imaging accurately reconstructs global ventricular repolarization patterns, offering a potential alternative to invasive mapping for assessing arrhythmia susceptibility.
Dispersion of ventricular repolarization due to abnormal activation contributes to the susceptibility to cardiac arrhythmias. However, the global pattern of repolarization is difficult to assess clinically. Activation recovery interval (ARI) has been used to understand the properties of ventricular repolarization. In this study, we developed an ARI imaging technique to noninvasively reconstruct three-dimensional (3D) ARI maps in 10 premature ventricular contraction (PVC) patients and evaluated the results with the endocardial ARI maps recorded by a clinical navigation system (CARTO). From the analysis results of a total of 100 PVC beats in 10 patients, the average correlation coefficient is 0.86±0.05 and the average relative error is 0.06±0.03. The average localization error is 4.5±2.3 mm between the longest ARI sites in 3D ARI maps and those in CARTO endocardial ARI maps. The present results suggest that ARI imaging could serve as an alternative of evaluating global pattern of ventricular repolarization noninvasively and could assist in the future investigation of the relationship between global repolarization dispersion and the susceptibility to cardiac arrhythmias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Premature ventricular contraction (n=10). Noninvasive 3D activation recovery interval (ARI) imaging vs. CARTO endocardial ARI maps was evaluated on Correlation coefficient, relative error, and localization error between 3D ARI maps and CARTO endocardial ARI maps. Noninvasive 3D activation recovery interval imaging showed an average correlation coefficient of 0.86±0.05 and localization error of 4.5±2.3 mm compared to invasive CARTO endocardial mapping.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: