Key result
The evolution of materials in cardiovascular stents and occluders highlights both the successes and challenges facing the translatability of concepts generated via academic research.
This review traces the evolution of materials used in cardiovascular stents and occluders, highlighting the challenges of translating academic research into clinical devices.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Translation challenges persist for novel stent materials; leaves open pathways for better academic-industry collaboration in device development.
Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in developed countries. Most academic research efforts in cardiovascular disease management focus on pharmacological interventions, or are concerned with discovering new disease markers for diagnosis and monitoring. Nonpharmacological interventions with therapeutic devices, conversely, are driven largely by novel materials and device design. Examples of such devices include coronary stents, heart valves, ventricular assist devices, and occluders for septal defects. Until recently, development of such devices remained largely with medical device companies. We trace the materials evolution story in two of these devices (stents and occluders), while also highlighting academic contributions, including our own, to the evolution story. Specifically, it addresses not only our successes, but also the challenges facing the translatability of concepts generated via academic research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2017) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular stents and occluders was evaluated. The evolution of materials in cardiovascular stents and occluders highlights both the successes and challenges facing the translatability of concepts generated via academic research.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: