The well-known triatomic hydrogen ion (H¹H¹H¹)⁺ of mass 3 is formed by electron impact at a rate proportional to the square of the pressure if the pressure is very low. The isotopic molecular ion (H¹H²)⁺, also of mass 3, would be expected to vary linearly with pressure. These two facts constitute a method for distinguishing between the two with a mass spectrograph whose resolving power is insufficient to separate them by magnetic analysis. The method becomes successful only when the working pressures are very low. With a mass spectrograph designed for low pressure work evidence was found which amply confirms the existence of an isotope of hydrogen of mass 2 and also gives a fair estimate of the abundance. In a sample of ordinary commercial electrolytic hydrogen the data indicate an abundance ratio H²H¹=1/30000±20%. The same ratio for a sample of hydrogen which had been concentrated by Urey, Brickwedde and Murphy came out to be H²H¹=1/1050±5%. An effort was made to detect a difference in mass between the ions (H¹H¹H¹)⁺ and (H¹H²)⁺ without success. Considering the resolving power of the apparatus this failure was interpreted as meaning that the packing fraction of H² is greater than 4×{}10^-3 i.e., the atomic weight is greater than 2.008. A search was also made for isotopes 3 and 5 of helium but none were found. It is concluded that their abundance must be less than one part in 50,000.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walker Bleakney (1932) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: