This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
To address controversies in the applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, we investigate the principles underlying the technique and discuss the implications for the evaluation of medical interventions. Using a standard von Neumann-Morgenstern utility framework, we show how a cost-effectiveness criterion can be derived to guide resource allocation decisions, and how it varies with age, gender, income level, and risk aversion. Although cost-effectiveness analysis can be a useful and powerful tool for resource allocation decisions, a uniform cost-effectiveness criterion that is applied to a heterogeneous population level is unlikely to yield Pareto-optimal resource allocations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garber et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: