Key result
Stable white coat hypertension with persistently elevated office blood pressure significantly increased the risk of cardiovascular death compared to normotension (HR 16; P=0.001).
Why the study?
Does stable white coat hypertension increase the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality compared to normotension?
Cohort
No
Does stable white coat hypertension increase the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality compared to normotension?
Effect estimate: HR 16 for cardiovascular death; HR 1.92 for all-cause death
p-value: p=0.001 for cardiovascular death; 0.02 for all-cause death
Persistent office blood pressure elevation in white coat hypertension (stable WCH) is associated with a significantly increased long-term risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, highlighting the prognostic relevance of repeated office BP measurements.
May warrant closer monitoring in stable WCH; leaves open whether it should guide treatment thresholds pending RCTs.
Stratification of cardiovascular risk is of fundamental importance in white coat hypertension (WCH) to identify individuals in need of closer follow-up and perhaps antihypertensive drug treatment. In subjects representative of the general population of Monza (Italy), the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality was assessed >16 years in stable and unstable WCH individuals, that is, those in whom ambulatory blood pressure (BP) normality was associated with a persistent or nonpersistent office BP elevation at 2 consecutive visits, respectively. Data were compared with those from an entirely normotensive group, that is, ambulatory and persistent office BP normality. Compared with the normotensive group, the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause death was not significantly different in unstable WCH, whereas in stable WCH the risk was increased also when data were adjusted for baseline confounders, including ambulatory BP (hazard ratio, 16; P=0.001 for cardiovascular death and 1.92; P=0.02 for all-cause death). At a multivariable analysis, office BP was among the factors independently predicting death, and results were superimposable with use of Monza population-derived and guidelines-derived cutoff values for ambulatory BP normality (125/79 and 130/80 mm Hg, respectively). Thus, only when office BP is persistently elevated does WCH reflect the existence of an abnormal long-term mortality risk. This means that in WCH office BP is prognostically relevant and that repeated collection of its values is clinically important to better define patient risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mancia et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in White coat hypertension. Stable white coat hypertension (persistent office BP elevation at 2 consecutive visits) vs. Normotensive group (ambulatory and persistent office BP normality) was evaluated on Cardiovascular and all-cause mortality (HR 16 for cardiovascular death; HR 1.92 for all-cause death, p=0.001 for cardiovascular death; 0.02 for all-cause death). Stable white coat hypertension with persistently elevated office blood pressure significantly increased the risk of cardiovascular death compared to normotension (HR 16; P=0.001).