Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is a highly-curable, aggressive form of lymphoma with disparities between international guidelines and treatment in resource-limited countries. We aimed to report outcomes in a multi-centered retrospective cohort of all cHL patients ≥ 18 years old exclusively treated with ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) without positron emission tomograph (PET)-adapted treatment between 2013 and 2022 in Thailand. First-line core treatment goals (FL-CTGs) for a resource-limited middle-income country were also investigated. One hundred ninety-two patients were included (median age 28.0 years, range 15, 79). The patients had an objective response rate of 90%. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 94.6% (95%CI 89.8%, 97.2%), and the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 62.2% (95%CI 54.2%, 69.3%). Both 3-year OS and PFS rates were higher in patients achieving FL-CTGs compared with those not achieving them in the early stage (Ann Arbor stages I and II) and advanced stage (Ann Arbor stages III and IV) groups. Advanced-stage patients not achieving FL-CTGs had a significantly higher risk of progression, relapse, or all-cause mortality (aHR 3.77, 95%CI 1.74, 8.17; p < 0.001). In conclusion, cHL patients treated exclusively with ABVD without PET-adapted treatment had good survival outcomes and achieving FL-CTGs is essential for good survival outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suttantapidok et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: