This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
In the decades since the terms ‘vulnerability’, ‘capacity’ and ‘resilience’ became popular in both the disaster and development literatures, through natural and social science discourses, the terms have been applied to many development‐ and disaster‐related policies and have been the subject of much debate and interpretation amongst various schools of thought. An illustrative review of the use of these terms is given followed by a critique of the main discourses, especially regarding the development and disaster policy advantages and disadvantages. Recommendations are given at different scales for closing some of the gaps identified, especially regarding the policy usefulness of certain theoretical approaches.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. C. Gaillard (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: