Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Our objective was to determine the optimal approach for assessing amyloid disease in a cognitively normal elderly population. Methods: Dynamic 18 F-flutemetamol PET scans were acquired using a coffeebreak protocol (a 0-to 30-min scan and a 90-to 110-min scan) on 190 cognitively normal elderly individuals (mean age, 70.4 y; 60% female). Parametric images were generated from SUV ratio (SUVr) and nondisplaceable binding potential (BP ND ) methods, with cerebellar gray matter as a reference region, and were visually assessed by 3 trained readers. Interreader agreement was calculated using -statistics, and semiquantitative values were obtained. Global cutoffs were calculated for both SUVr and BP ND using a receiver-operating-characteristic analysis and the Youden index. Visual assessment was related to semiquantitative classifications. Results: Interreader agreement in visual assessment was moderate for SUVr ( 5 0.57) and good for BP ND images ( 5 0.77). There was discordance between readers for 35 cases (18%) using SUVr and for 15 cases (8%) using BP ND , with 9 overlapping cases. For the total cohort, the mean (SD) SUVr and BP ND were 1.33 (0.21) and 0.16 (0.12), respectively. Most of the 35 cases (91%) for which SUVr image assessment was discordant between readers were classified as negative based on semiquantitative measurements. Conclusion: The use of parametric BP ND images for visual assessment of 18 F-flutemetamol in a population with low amyloid burden improves interreader agreement. Implementing semiquantification in addition to visual assessment of SUVr images can reduce false-positive classification in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Collij et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: