Key result
AI segmentation on CTPA detects left atrial dilatation with higher CMR agreement than expert radiologists.
Why the study?
Identifying left atrial dilatation on CTPA could aid diagnosis of cardiovascular disease, prompting assessment of an AI segmentation model's performance.
Does an AI segmentation model improve the accuracy of detecting left atrial dilatation on CTPA compared to expert radiologist reports in patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension?
Observational (n=451)
No
Does an AI segmentation model improve the accuracy of detecting left atrial dilatation on CTPA compared to expert radiologist reports in patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension?
Deep learning-based automated segmentation of non-ECG-gated CTPA accurately quantifies left atrial volume and outperforms routine radiologist reporting in detecting left atrial dilatation.
May aid left atrial dilatation detection on CTPA over routine reports; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
Introduction: Left atrial (LA) dilatation predicts several cardiovascular disorders. Identifying LA dilatation on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) could aid diagnosis of cardiovascular disease. This study assessed an artificial intelligence (AI) segmentation model's performance at detecting LA dilatation on CTPA. Methods: Patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension (PH) who underwent CTPA and cardiac MRI (CMR) were retrospectively identified from a single centre registry. The LA was segmented by an AI tool for CTPA and a validated AI tool for CMR. LA volume measurements were categorised for LA dilatation based on existing threshold values. The expert radiologist's reports of the CTPA studies were also categorised for LA dilatation. Automated CTPA LA volumes and corresponding radiologist reports were compared against the reference standard of CMR. Results: 451 patients were included (mean age 64 ± 13 years, 62.5 % female, 85.8 % white). Automated LA volume measurements on CTPA showed strong positive correlation with those on CMR (ρ = 0.92, p < 0.001) with minimal bias on Bland-Altman analysis (-4 mL, 95 %CI -39 to +31 mL). Automated LA measurements on CTPA showed higher agreement with those on CMR (κ = 0.80) than the radiologist reports (κ = 0.62). Automated LA measurements on CTPA showed higher accuracy metrics (sensitivity 81.0 %, specificity 96.8 %, positive predictive value (PPV) 88.5 %, negative predictive value (NPV) 94.4 %) than the radiologist reports (sensitivity 66.7 %, specificity 93.1 %, PPV 74.5 %, NPV 90.2 %). Conclusion: Deep learning increases the accuracy of LA volume measurements on non-ECG gated CTPA, improving radiologist performance in detecting LA dilatation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tapper et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Suspected pulmonary hypertension (n=451). Automated AI segmentation of left atrium on CTPA vs. Expert radiologist reports was evaluated on Agreement (Cohen's kappa) with CMR for detecting left atrial dilatation (95% CI 0.73-0.86, p=<0.001). An artificial intelligence model for automated left atrial segmentation on CTPA accurately detected left atrial dilatation, demonstrating higher agreement with CMR (kappa 0.80) than expert radiologist reports (kappa 0.62).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: