Key result
A 6-month comprehensive heart care program significantly increased the proportion of high-risk women who knew all signs and symptoms of a heart attack from 38.8% to 64.2%.
Why the study?
Does a comprehensive heart care program improve cardiovascular knowledge and reduce risk factors in high-risk women?
Population
1310 high-risk women patients at six U.S. women's heart programs
Comparison
6-month comprehensive heart health counseling… vs Pre-intervention baseline
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
6 months
Authors
Loading...
May improve symptom knowledge in high-risk women; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Observational (n=1,310)
Yes
Does a comprehensive heart care program improve cardiovascular knowledge and reduce risk factors in high-risk women?
Absolute Event Rate: 64.2% vs 38.8%
p-value: p=<0.001
A comprehensive heart care program based on AHA/ACC guidelines significantly improves cardiovascular knowledge and risk factor profiles in high-risk women over 6 months.
Villablanca et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular disease risk (n=1,310). Comprehensive heart care program vs. Baseline (pre-intervention) was evaluated on Knowledge of all signs and symptoms of a heart attack (p=<0.001). A 6-month comprehensive heart care program significantly increased the proportion of high-risk women who knew all signs and symptoms of a heart attack from 38.8% to 64.2%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: