This paper considers the problem of estimating the dispersion parameter in a Gaussian model which is intermediate between a model where the mean parameter is fully known (fixed) and a model where the mean parameter is completely unknown. One of the goals is to understand the implications of the two-step process of first selecting a model among a finite number of sub-models, and then estimating a parameter of interest after the model selection, but using the same sample data. The estimators are classified into global, two-step, and weighted-type estimators. While the global-type estimators ignore the model space structure, the two-step estimators explore the structure adaptively and can be related to pre-test estimators, and the weighted estimators are motivated by the Bayesian approach. Their performances are compared theoretically and through simulations using their risk functions based on a scale invariant quadratic loss function. It is shown that in the variance estimation problem efficiency gains arise by exploiting the sub-model structure through the use of two-step and weighted estimators, especially when the number of competing sub-models is few; but that this advantage may deteriorate or be lost altogether for some two-step estimators as the number of sub-models increases or as the distance between them decreases. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that weighted estimators, arising from properly chosen priors, outperform two-step estimators when there are many competing sub-models or when the sub-models are close to each other, whereas two-step estimators are preferred when the sub-models are highly distinguishable. The results have implications regarding model averaging and model selection issues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dukić et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: