Key result
Test dabigatran etexilate shows bioequivalence to the reference formulation under both fasting and fed conditions.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to test the bioequivalence of two formulations of dabigatran etexilate capsules in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and postprandial conditions.
Does a generic dabigatran etexilate 150 mg capsule achieve bioequivalence to the reference formulation in healthy Chinese subjects?
RCT (n=100)
Open-label
Randomized
No
Does a generic dabigatran etexilate 150 mg capsule achieve bioequivalence to the reference formulation in healthy Chinese subjects?
A generic formulation of dabigatran etexilate 150 mg capsules is bioequivalent to the reference formulation (Pradaxa) in healthy Chinese subjects under both fasting and postprandial conditions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports generic dabigatran substitution in Chinese patients; confirms bioequivalence in this population.
Among healthy Chinese subjects, two capsules of dabigatran etexilate were tested for bioequivalence. Fifty healthy subjects were recruited for each of the fasting and postprandial trials in a randomized, two-sequence, open-label, four-cycle, fully replicated trial design of a single 150 mg dose of either the test or the reference formulation of dabigatran etexilate capsules in the fasting and postprandial states. The blood concentration of dabigatran at different time points after administration was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). The bioequivalence of the two formulations was evaluated by means of the main pharmacokinetic parameters and relative bioavailability. There were 39 males and 11 females in both fasting and postprandial groups. The age, height, weight and BMI of subjects in the fasting group were 19.0–41.0 years old, 148.5–182.0 cm, 46.1–81.0 kg and 19.2–25.7 kg/m2, respectively, and those in the postprandial group were 18.0–43.0 years old, 145.5–182.5 cm, 45.2–82.0 kg and 19.2–25.9 kg/m2, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios of Cmax, AUC0–t and AUC0–∞ for the total dabigatran in fasting test and reference formulations were 92.41–104.30%, 92.59–104.27% and 93.10–104.27%, respectively. The 90% CIs for the geometric mean ratios of three important parameters Cmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞ pertaining to the total dabigatran in the postprandial test and reference formulations were 97.29–107.77%, 100.43–107.96%, and 100.19–107.40%, respectively. The 90% CIs for the geometric mean ratios of the main pharmacokinetic parameters of the test and reference formulations were in the ranged from 80. 00–125. 00%, and the upper limits of the 90% CIs for the intraindividual variability ratios were ≤2.5. No serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in the fasting and postprandial groups. The 2 dabigatran etexilate capsules were bioequivalent in both fasting and postprandial states and had favorable safety profile. The enrollment process in this study was finalized on the “Chemical Drug Bioequivalence Trial Record Information Platform.” ( http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn , 04/07/2023, CTR20231968).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Healthy subjects (n=100). Dabigatran etexilate capsule (test formulation) vs. Dabigatran etexilate capsule (reference formulation/Pradaxa) was evaluated on Bioequivalence (Cmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-∞). A single 150 mg dose of the test dabigatran etexilate capsule was bioequivalent to the reference formulation in healthy Chinese subjects under both fasting and postprandial conditions.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: