Key result
Two formulations of the 10-mg rivaroxaban tablet were bioequivalent in healthy subjects under fasting and fed conditions, with all 90% CIs for AUC and Cmax ratios within the acceptable range.
Why the study?
This study aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence of two formulations of the 10-mg rivaroxaban tablet under fasting and fed conditions.
Are the two formulations of 10-mg rivaroxaban bioequivalent in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions?
RCT (n=28)
Open-label
randomized
Are the two formulations of 10-mg rivaroxaban bioequivalent in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions?
The test formulation of 10-mg rivaroxaban is bioequivalent to the reference formulation in healthy Chinese subjects under both fasting and fed conditions.
Supports substitution with the test formulation in Chinese patients; extends bioequivalence data to this population.
This study aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence (BE) of 2 formulations of the 10‐mg rivaroxaban tablet. The study was a randomized, open‐label, 4‐period, crossover study that included 28 healthy subjects in fasting or fed conditions. The pharmacokinetic parameters were determined based on the concentrations of rivaroxaban using high‐performance liquid chromatography with a tandem mass spectrometer detector. In each of the 4 study periods with fasting or fed conditions, a single dose of test or reference product was administered. Rivaroxaban concentrations in plasma were determined using a validated liquid chromatography with a tandem mass spectrometer detector method. The pharmacokinetic parameters assessed were the area under the plasma concentration‐time curve (AUC0‐t, AUC0‐∞), the peak plasma concentration of the drug (Cmax), time to achieve Cmax, elimination half‐life, within‐subject variability of test drug, and within‐subject variability of reference drug. The geometric mean ratio (90%CI) of the test drug/reference drug for rivaroxaban was 90.38% to 103.60% for AUC0‐t in fasting conditions and 90.13% to 100.42% in fed conditions. The AUC0‐∞s were 89.94% to 102.50% and 90.14% to 100.45% under fasting and fed conditions, respectively. The Cmax values were 90.58% to 105.01% and 96.36% to 108.07% in these 2 conditions, respectively. All 90%CIs for test drug/reference drug geometric mean ratio were ≤2.5. The 90%CIs for test/reference AUC ratio and Cmax ratio were within the acceptable range for BE. There were no adverse events encountered during this BE study. The study's results indicated that the 2 formulations of the rivaroxaban tablet were bioequivalent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ding et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Healthy subjects (n=28). Rivaroxaban (test formulation) vs. Rivaroxaban (reference formulation) was evaluated on Bioequivalence (AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, Cmax). Two formulations of the 10-mg rivaroxaban tablet were bioequivalent in healthy subjects under fasting and fed conditions, with all 90% CIs for AUC and Cmax ratios within the acceptable range.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: