Key result
A generic rivaroxaban formulation was bioequivalent to the branded formulation (Xarelto) under both fasted and fed conditions, with geometric mean ratio 90% CIs within 80% to 125%.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetic profile, and bioequivalence of a generic and a branded rivaroxaban formulation under fasted and fed conditions in healthy Chinese volunteers.
Does a generic rivaroxaban formulation demonstrate bioequivalence to the branded formulation in healthy Chinese volunteers?
RCT (n=72)
Open-label
crossover
Does a generic rivaroxaban formulation demonstrate bioequivalence to the branded formulation in healthy Chinese volunteers?
A generic formulation of rivaroxaban 20 mg demonstrated pharmacokinetic bioequivalence to the branded formulation in healthy Chinese volunteers under both fasted and fed conditions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change practice pending patient data; leaves open real-world effectiveness of this generic rivaroxaban.
Rivaroxaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor used for the management of thromboembolic disorders. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetic profile, and bioequivalence of a generic and a branded rivaroxaban formulation (Xarelto) under fasted and fed conditions in healthy Chinese volunteers. An open-label, randomized, single-dose, 4-period complete, and replicate crossover study in healthy Chinese volunteers was performed. A single oral dose of 20 mg of 2 rivaroxaban formulations was administered to 72 healthy volunteers, with 36 in the fasted group and 36 consuming a high-fat diet. The evaluated pharmacokinetic parameters, including maximum rivaroxaban concentration, the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, and AUC from time 0 to infinity, were assessed for BE. The plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban were measured by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The geometric mean ratios with 90% confidence intervals of the maximum rivaroxaban concentration, AUC from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, and AUC from time 0 to infinity were all within the range of 80% to 125% under fasted and fed conditions. The within-subject variability of the test and reference products was compared, and the upper limit of the 90% confidence intervals for the test-to-reference ratio of the within-subject variability was <2.5, which indicated that the rivaroxaban test and the rivaroxaban reference formulation were bioequivalent. No serious adverse events were reported during either fasted or fed conditions of the study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tao et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Healthy (n=72). Generic rivaroxaban formulation vs. Branded rivaroxaban formulation (Xarelto) was evaluated on Bioequivalence based on maximum rivaroxaban concentration and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). A generic rivaroxaban formulation was bioequivalent to the branded formulation (Xarelto) under both fasted and fed conditions, with geometric mean ratio 90% CIs within 80% to 125%.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: