Why the study?
To demonstrate the bioequivalence of 2 oral tablet formulations of rivaroxaban 20 mg in healthy Mexican volunteers under fed conditions.
Does a test formulation of rivaroxaban 20 mg demonstrate bioequivalence to a reference formulation in healthy Mexican volunteers under fed conditions?
Does a test formulation of rivaroxaban 20 mg demonstrate bioequivalence to a reference formulation in healthy Mexican volunteers under fed conditions?
A test formulation of rivaroxaban 20 mg was shown to be bioequivalent to the reference formulation (Xarelto) and well tolerated in healthy Mexican volunteers under fed conditions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports substitution with the test rivaroxaban formulation; confirms bioequivalence to Xarelto in Mexican volunteers.
The objective of this study was to demonstrate the bioequivalence of 2 oral tablet formulations of rivaroxaban 20 mg in healthy Mexican volunteers under fed conditions. This phase I, single‐blind, single‐dose, randomized, two‐sequence, two‐period crossover study included 32 volunteers. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two sequences: test formulation (single 20 mg dose) in the first period followed by the reference formulation (single 20 mg dose) in the second, or vice versa. Blood samples were collected predose and at predefined timepoints across a 48‐hour period after drug intake. Rivaroxaban plasma concentrations were measured using a validated high‐performance liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry method. Pharmacokinetic parameters included maximum plasma concentration (C max ), area under the plasma concentration‐time curve from time zero to last measurable concentration and to infinity (AUC 0‐t , AUC 0‐∞ ), time to reach C max , and half‐life. Safety was evaluated through adverse‐event monitoring using subject interviews and recording of vital signs. The 90% confidence intervals for the test/reference geometric mean ratios of C max (100.4%–112.7%), AUC 0‐t (96.5%–111.6%), and AUC 0‐∞ (95.5%–109.5%) were within the bioequivalence acceptance range (80‐125%). Two adverse events (headaches) were recorded. Both formulations of rivaroxaban 20 mg tablets were bioequivalent and well tolerated in a healthy population of Mexican volunteers under fed conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Genis‐Najera et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: