AL amyloidosis patients ineligible for dose-intensive melphalan (200 mg/m2) were enrolled on a phase 11 trial to be treated with two cycles of intermediate-dose melphalan (IDM 100 mg/m2) and mobilized blood stem cells (BSC). For mobilization patients were randomized to either GM-CSF 250 microg/m2 for 3 d followed by G-CSF 10 microg/ kg for 3 d (GM+G), or G-CSF 10 microg/kg for 6 d (G-alone), with leukaphereses on days 5, 6 and 7. To minimize morbidity, we planned to support each cycle with 3 5 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg and had a collection target of 7 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. Those who did not achieve the target were treated with one cycle of IDM. 30 patients, a median of 62 years old and 7 months from diagnosis, were enrolled. Both mobilization regimens were generally well tolerated, and similar in terms of CD34+ cells and CFU-GM collected, but only 6/28 patients achieved the collection target (GM+G four, G-alone two). Despite a 19% incidence of grade 4 toxicities, IDM therapy was well tolerated. At a median follow-up of 24 months (19-36) 57% of patients had survived, 17% with durable complete haematological responses and 40% with improved or stable amyloid organ involvement, including 3/9 patients with predominant cardiac amyloid who are alive 2-3 years after treatment. The 100 d mortality was 20%. In conclusion, no definitive differences were identified between the mobilization regimens and IDM was an active regimen in AL for selected patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Comenzo et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: