Key result
DOACs preserve kidney function better than VKAs and offer potential safety benefits in AF.
Why the study?
Chronic kidney disease and atrial fibrillation mutually aggravate each other, raising concerns about anticoagulant safety, the faster renal decline seen with vitamin K antagonists, and DOAC use in advanced CKD.
Does the choice between direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists affect kidney function progression in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease?
Does the choice between direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists affect kidney function progression in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review highlights that DOACs may be preferable to vitamin K antagonists in patients with AF and CKD to prevent accelerated vascular calcification and kidney function decline.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with a five-fold increase in the risk for ischemic stroke. Therefore, lifelong use of anticoagulants is crucial to reduce the morbidity and mortality burden of AF. The incidence of AF in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is two to three times greater than in the general population, and there is a mutual aggravation of the two conditions as well as the presence of both an increased thromboembolic risk in CKD and an increased bleeding risk in severe CKD. The preservation of kidney function in patients with cardiovascular diseases is important, as the latter is the leading cause of death in patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Similarly, kidney dysfunction is a serious limitation to the use of many cardiovascular drugs, including anticoagulants. Evidence is present for the faster progression of kidney disease with vitamin K antagonists, likely due to the vitamin K-related process of vascular calcification. Conversely, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been shown to reduce the progression of CKD and have a beneficial effect as far as the modulation of inflammation and oxidative stress are concerned in experimental models. Another less-discussed problem is the use of DOACs in advanced CKD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D Gencheva (2023) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonists was evaluated. Direct oral anticoagulants demonstrate more favorable effects on kidney function and a potentially better safety profile compared to vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: