Why the study?
Atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease frequently co-occur, heightening thrombotic risks, while direct oral anticoagulants have increasingly emerged as alternatives to warfarin across varying stages of renal impairment.
Do direct oral anticoagulants improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease compared to warfarin?
Do direct oral anticoagulants improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease compared to warfarin?
This review summarizes the evidence for using direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with concurrent atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease across different stages of renal impairment.
AF-CKD overlap may heighten thromboembolic risk; leaves open optimal anticoagulation strategies in this population.
Due to the population aging and the accumulation of concomitant diseases, the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) as the most common arrhythmia is increasing. On the other hand, 14% of the population has chronic kidney disease (CKD). These conditions are often combined with each other causing a prothrombogenic effect, which significantly increase the number of unfavorable outcomes such as thromboembolism, stroke, myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death. This is especially true for the last stages of CKD, the so-called end-stage renal disease with a glomerular filtration rate <29 ml/min/1,73 m 2 . Previously, the vitamin K antagonist warfarin was the central drug for anticoagulant therapy of AF + CKD combination, but in the last decade, direct oral anticoagulants became widely used. This article discusses the evidence base for using each of the anticoagulants in patients with AF+CKD combination compared with warfarin, including depending on the severity of glomerular filtration rate decrease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Загидуллин et al. (2021) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Warfarin was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: