Why the study?
Does an intervention to enhance self-management of heart disease improve psychosocial and physical functioning in older adults?
Does an intervention to enhance self-management of heart disease improve psychosocial and physical functioning in older adults?
Self-management interventions in older adults with heart disease yield transient psychosocial and sex-specific physical benefits, suggesting a need for tailored and sustained follow-up.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports self-management programs for psychosocial gains in older heart disease patients; extends evidence on need for sustained, sex-tailored follow-up.
A randomized, controlled trial involving 636 older individuals was conducted to evaluate an intervention to enhance self-management of heart disease. Program participants experienced less impact of illness on their psychosocial functioning (p <.05), especially their emotional behavior (p < .05) and alertness (p < .01). Compared to controls, male program participants experienced improvements in their physical functioning, specifically their ability to ambulate (p < .05) and the frequency and severity of their symptoms. Female program participants did not experience gains in physical functioning. Most group differences emerged by 12 months and decayed by the 18-month final evaluation. To accurately assess the pattern of change associated with a program of this type, evaluation over at least 18 months following program completion may be needed. Separate interventions for older men and women with heart disease appear warranted, as do follow-up activities at strategic points in time to sustain program effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clark et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: