Key result
KDIGO 2024 CKD screening criteria show acceptable detection in men but perform poorly in women.
Why the study?
To investigate whether currently recommended KDIGO 2024 screening criteria equally detect CKD in women and men across ethnic groups, and whether adding optional criteria improves performance.
Do the currently recommended KDIGO 2024 screening criteria equally detect chronic kidney disease in women and men across ethnic groups, and does adding optional criteria improve performance?
Observational
Do the currently recommended KDIGO 2024 screening criteria equally detect chronic kidney disease in women and men across ethnic groups, and does adding optional criteria improve performance?
Current KDIGO 2024 screening criteria for chronic kidney disease perform worse in women than in men, and the addition of optional criteria provides limited predictive improvement.
KDIGO 2024 criteria underperform in women; hypothesis-generating for sex-specific thresholds but should not yet change practice.
Objective: To investigate whether the currently recommended screening criteria in Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes 2024 guidelines (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease) equally detect women and men across ethnic groups and whether consideration of optional criteria (education level, occupation, obesity, and genetic risk factors) listed in the guideline improves performance. Patients and Methods: or albumin-to-creatinine ratio of >3 mg/mmol. Poisson regression analyses estimated associations between CKD and optional criteria on top of current screening criteria. Model comparisons were made with likelihood ratio tests and Akaike information criterion estimations in women and men. Area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated by sex and ethnicity. Results: Chronic kidney disease prevalence ranged from 2.9% to 8.8% in women and 3.2% to 8.6% in men. Low educational level (women only) and obesity significantly improved the models with current criteria with CKD. High-risk occupations and polygenic risk score did not improve the model. However, these criteria did not improve predictive measures across ethnic groups. Overall, the AUCs for the current screening criteria were acceptable in men (AUC, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.73-0.77) and poor in women (AUC, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.63-0.67), and showed minimal change after adding the optional criteria. Conclusion: Current screening criteria may not be equally detecting women and men across ethnic groups with CKD. Optional criteria had limited added value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vosters et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Chronic Kidney Disease. Current KDIGO 2024 screening criteria vs. Optional screening criteria was evaluated on Area under the curve (AUC) for CKD detection (95% CI 0.73-0.77). Current KDIGO 2024 screening criteria for chronic kidney disease showed acceptable detection performance in men (AUC 0.75; 95% CI 0.73-0.77) but poor performance in women (AUC 0.65; 95% CI 0.63-0.67).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: