Key result
In overweight patients with type 2 diabetes, weight loss combined with improved glycaemic control had additive beneficial effects, significantly improving left ventricular global longitudinal strain to -19.3%.
Why the study?
Does weight loss combined with improved glycaemic control improve left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes?
Case-Control (n=50)
Observer-blinded
No
Does weight loss combined with improved glycaemic control improve left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes?
In overweight patients with type 2 diabetes, weight loss and improved glycaemic control have additive beneficial effects on subclinical left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction.
May support combined weight loss and glycaemic control for subclinical LV dysfunction in T2D; leaves open need for randomized outcome trials.
AIMS: Weight loss in obese patients leads to improved left ventricular (LV) function. It is unclear whether improving glycaemic control has additional benefits to weight loss alone in patients with type 2 diabetes, or if benefits of weight loss are mediated through improving glycaemic control. This case-control study examined the incremental impact of these approaches on LV function. METHODS: Three groups of age, gender, and baseline HbA1c-matched patients with type 2 diabetes and suboptimal glycaemic control were followed-up for 12 months. Group 1 patients did not improve HbA1c ≥ 1 % (10.9 mmol/mol) or lose weight. Group 2 improved HbA1c ≥ 1 % but did not lose weight. Group 3 improved HbA1c ≥ 1 % (10.9 mmol/mol) and lost weight. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiogram at baseline and at follow-up. RESULTS: At baseline, three groups were comparable in all clinical and metabolic parameters except Group 3 had highest body mass index. The three groups had similar echocardiographic parameters except Group 3 had the worst LV systolic function [global longitudinal strain (GLS)]. At follow-up, LV ejection fraction and diastolic function improved with a reduction in filling pressures in Group 2 and more so in Group 3. LV filling pressures in Group 1 increased. There was a significant improvement in GLS in Group 2 and more so in Group 3. Despite GLS being the worst in Group 3 at baseline, this was comparable between Groups 2 and 3 at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In overweight patients with type 2 diabetes, weight loss and improved glycaemic control had additive beneficial effects on improving LV systolic and diastolic function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leung et al. (2016) conducted a case-control in Type 2 diabetes with suboptimal glycaemic control (n=50). Weight loss and improved glycaemic control vs. No weight loss and worse/no improvement in glycaemic control was evaluated on Left ventricular global longitudinal systolic strain (GLS) at 12 months (p=<0.05). In overweight patients with type 2 diabetes, weight loss combined with improved glycaemic control had additive beneficial effects, significantly improving left ventricular global longitudinal strain to -19.3%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: