Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LINE-1 retrotransposons are the only autonomous mobile elements still active in human genomes and remain a potent source of mutation, genome remodeling, and disease risk. However, young, full-length, potentially active copies (the elements most likely to shape present-day genomes) have been largely inaccessible to population-scale analysis because they are long, repetitive, and poorly resolved by short-read sequencing. Here, we use 47 phased long-read assemblies from the Human Pangenome Reference Consortium, representing 94 haplotypes, to build an allele-resolved view of recent human LINE-1 evolution. We identify 13,617 LINE-1 alleles with intact ORF1 and ORF2 across 683 unique insertion sites, revealing that every genome carries a distinct repertoire of potentially active source elements. These intact LINE-1 profiles recapitulate broad human population structure while exposing a large, rare, and population-enriched reservoir of mobile-element diversity missed by single-reference approaches. We also resolve a structurally variable chromosome 11 LINE-1 array, demonstrating that local duplication and rearrangement can amplify LINE-1 sequence independently of canonical retrotransposition. By comparing full-length LINE-1 sequences, we define activity signatures that separate ancient remnants from recently expanding lineages and uncover young LINE-1 groups whose activity is not fully explained by canonical subfamily labels. Sequence-network analyses further reveal a dynamic history of lineage turnover, in which successful source elements rise, seed new insertions, and are replaced by descendants marked by specific nucleotide changes. Together, these data transform human LINE-1s from a repetitive background into a resolved evolutionary system, linking insertion polymorphism, coding potential, population history, and recent retrotransposon adaptation. Our findings establish the human pangenome as a framework for discovering active source elements and for testing how mobile DNA continues to shape genome evolution, host defense, and disease risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: