Why the study?
The EAU biochemical recurrence risk grouping relies on historical cohorts using conventional imaging, leaving patterns of PSMA PET/CT positivity between risk groups uncharacterized.
Does the EAU BCR risk group predict the rate and pattern of 68Ga-PSMA-11PET/CT positivity in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy?
Cohort (n=435)
Does the EAU BCR risk group predict the rate and pattern of 68Ga-PSMA-11PET/CT positivity in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy?
The EAU BCR risk groups have different rates of PSMA PET/CT positivity, suggesting that integrating PSMA PET/CT positivity predictors into risk calculators might improve patient classification.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform PSMA PET/CT selection after prostatectomy; extends EAU BCR groups but remains hypothesis-generating.
(1) Background: The European Association of Urology (EAU) biochemical recurrence (BCR) risk grouping relies on data from historical cohorts that used conventional imaging techniques. In the era of PSMA PET/CT, we compared the patterns of positivity in the two risk groups and provided insight into positivity predictive factors. (2) Methods: Data from 1185 patients who underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11PET/CT for BCR was analyzed, out of which 435 patients treated initially treated by radical prostatectomy were included in the final analysis. (3) Results: A significantly higher rate of positivity in the BCR high-risk group was observed (59% vs. 36%, p < 0.001). BCR low-risk group demonstrated more local (26% vs. 6%, p < 0.001) and oligometastatic (100% vs. 81%, p < 0.001) recurrences. The BCR risk group and PSA level at the time of PSMA PET/CT were independent predictive factors of positivity. (4) Conclusions: This study confirms that the EAU BCR risk groups have different rates of PSMA PET/CT positivity. Even with a lower rate in the BCR low-risk group, oligometastatic disease was 100% in those with distant metastases. Given the presence of discordant positivity and risk classification, integrating PSMA PET/CT positivity predictors into risk calculators for BCR might improve patient classification for subsequent treatment options. Future prospective studies are still needed to validate the above findings and assumptions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leplat et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (n=435). EAU BCR high-risk group vs. EAU BCR low-risk group was evaluated on PSMA PET/CT positivity rate (p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: