Key result
Remote ischemic preconditioning preserves endothelial function after ischemia-reperfusion through autonomic neural pathways.
Why the study?
Does remote ischemic preconditioning prevent endothelial ischemia-reperfusion injury in humans, and what is its time course and mechanism?
Does remote ischemic preconditioning prevent endothelial ischemia-reperfusion injury in humans, and what is its time course and mechanism?
Remote ischemic preconditioning provides biphasic (early and late) neuronally mediated protection against endothelial ischemia-reperfusion injury in humans.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to characterize the time course and neuronal mechanism of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) of the vasculature in humans. BACKGROUND: Non-lethal ischemia of internal organs induces local (ischemic preconditioning) and systemic (RIPC) resistance to lethal ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury. Experimental RIPC has two temporal components, is neuronally mediated, is induced by limb ischemia, and reduces infarct size. In humans, RIPC prevents IR-induced vascular injury. Determining the time course and mechanism is a prelude to clinical outcome studies of RIPC. METHODS: Endothelial IR injury was induced by arm ischemia (20 min) and reperfusion, and measured by flow-mediated dilation. To establish if there are early and late phases, RIPC (three 5-min cycles of ischemia of the contralateral arm) was applied immediately, 4, 24, and 48 h before IR. To determine neuronal involvement, trimetaphan (autonomic ganglion blocker; 1 to 6 mg/min intravenous) was infused during the application of the RIPC stimulus. RESULTS: Flow-mediated dilation was reduced by IR (8.7 +/- 1.1% before IR, 4.9 +/- 1.2% after IR; p < 0.001), but not when preceded by RIPC (8.0 +/- 0.8% after IR; p = NS); RIPC did not protect after 4 h (4.9 +/- 1.1% after IR; p < 0.001), but protected at 24 (8.7 +/- 1.1% after IR; p = NS) and 48 h (8.8 +/- 1.4% after IR; p = NS). Trimetaphan attenuated early (8.3 +/- 1.1% before IR, 4.2 +/- 0.9% after IR; p < 0.05) and delayed (7.3 +/- 1.0% before IR, 2.3 +/- 0.6% after IR, p < 0.001) RIPC. CONCLUSIONS: Remote ischemic preconditioning in humans has two phases of protection against endothelial IR injury; an early (short) and late (prolonged) phase, both of which are neuronally mediated. The potential for late phase RIPC to provide prolonged protection during clinical IR syndromes merits investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loukogeorgakis et al. (2005) studied Endothelial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) vs. Ischemia-reperfusion without preconditioning was evaluated on Flow-mediated dilation after ischemia-reperfusion injury (p=NS). Remote ischemic preconditioning prevented ischemia-reperfusion-induced reduction in flow-mediated dilation immediately (8.0%) and at 24-48 hours (8.7-8.8%), an effect attenuated by ganglion blockade.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: