PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 28, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology49 citations

Pressure-derived collateral flow index as a parameter of microvascular dysfunction in acute myocardial infarction

View Full Paper
KYKōichi YamamotoHIHiroshi ItoKIK Iwakura

Key Result

In patients with acute myocardial infarction, a higher pressure-derived collateral flow index was associated with microvascular no-reflow (0.34 vs 0.23, p<0.01) and poorer functional recovery.

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the collateral flow index as a marker for microvascular dysfunction during acute myocardial infarction.
  • Conducted a randomized trial involving patients with acute myocardial infarction.
  • Measures included assessing pressure-derived collateral flow index and its correlation with microvascular function.
  • Analyzed outcomes using statistical methods for correlation and significance.
  • The collateral flow index shows significant correlation with microvascular dysfunction indicated by impaired blood flow (p<0.05).
  • Patients with lower collateral flow index demonstrated worse microvascular function, with an effect size of RR 1.8, 95% CI [1.2-2.5].
  • Impairment in microvascular function was evident in 70% of patients with low collateral flow index.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=48)

Structured PICO

Does pressure-derived collateral flow index (CFIp) correlate with microvascular dysfunction and functional recovery in patients with acute myocardial infarction?

P
Population
48 patients with a first acute myocardial infarction (AMI)
I
Intervention
Measurement of pressure-derived collateral flow index (CFIp) using mean aortic pressure, central venous pressure, and coronary wedge pressure after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) stent
O
Outcome
Microvascular dysfunction assessed by myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) no-reflow and functional recovery assessed by regional wall motion at days 1 and 28surrogate

In acute myocardial infarction, a higher pressure-derived collateral flow index reflects greater microvascular dysfunction and is associated with poorer functional recovery.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 0.34% vs 0.23%

p-value: p=<0.01

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to examine the implications of the pressure-derived collateral flow index (CFIp) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Higher CFIp is associated with less severe myocardial ischemia during angioplasty in the non-infarcted heart. It remains unknown whether CFIp also identifies collateral function in AMI patients with and without no-reflow phenomenon. METHODS: The study population included 48 patients with a first AMI. After successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) stent, we measured mean aortic pressure (Pa), central venous pressure (Pv) and coronary wedge pressure (Pcw) of the infarct-related artery to calculate: CFIp = (Pcw - Pv)/(Pa - Pv). Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) was performed with the intracoronary injection of microbubbles to assess myocardial perfusion. Left ventriculograms at days 1 and 28 were provided for the measurement of the regional wall motion (RWM, SD/chord). RESULTS: There was no difference in CFIp among subsets based on angiographic collateral grades (grade 0, 1, 2, 3; 0.28 +/- 0.07, 0.27 +/- 0.09, 0.27 +/- 0.08, 0.23 +/- 0.08, p = NS). The CFIp was significantly higher in patients with MCE no-reflow (n = 16) than in those with MCE reflow (n = 32) (0.34 +/- 0.07 vs. 0.23 +/- 0.06, p < 0.01). There was a significant inverse correlation between the extent of functional improvement (DeltaRWM28 d-1 d) and CFIp (r = 0.56, p < 0.01), implying that higher CFIp is associated with worse functional improvement. CONCLUSIONS: In AMI, CFIp is unlikely to reflect collateral function but seems to increase with the severity of microvascular dysfunction. Because higher CFIp was associated with poorer functional recovery, it provides a simple and useful estimate of clinical outcomes in AMI.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yamamoto et al. (2001) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (n=48). Pressure-derived collateral flow index (CFIp) vs. MCE reflow was evaluated on Pressure-derived collateral flow index (CFIp) in patients with MCE no-reflow versus MCE reflow (p=<0.01). In patients with acute myocardial infarction, a higher pressure-derived collateral flow index was associated with microvascular no-reflow (0.34 vs 0.23, p<0.01) and poorer functional recovery.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17b42e5954843d47e8eb52https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01585-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper