Why the study?
Does active problem solving compared to passive observation affect heart rate and skin conductance responses?
Does active problem solving compared to passive observation affect heart rate and skin conductance responses?
The study supports the concept that tonic heart rate and skin conductance response amplitude may serve as indices of the behavioral activation and inhibition systems, respectively.
Active engagement may alter autonomic responses versus passive observation; leaves open validation of heart rate and skin conductance as behavioral activation/inhibition indices.
Sixty subjects were administered 33 tasks, selected from the Raven Progressive Matrices, in conditions that differed by type of monetary reinforcement (reward, frustration, and control group). Subjects were tested in pairs. One subject, assigned as the active one, was asked to solve a problem while the other was only a passive observer. Heart rate level and the amplitude of evoked skin conductance responses were measured. Statistical analysis detected a higher heart rate level in active versus passive subjects at the beginning stage of the experiment, as well as a faster heart rate decrease in the former versus the latter group during subsequent blocks of four tasks. Changes in skin conductance response magnitude during the ensuing task phases exhibited a descending trend in passive subjects and an ascending trend in active subjects. The monetary reinforcement manipulation was not effective. The results support a concept put forward by Fowles (1988), who maintained that tonic heart rate and skin conductance response amplitude may serve as indices of the behavioral activation system and behavioral inhibition system, respectively, as postulated by Gray's model of arousal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sosnowski et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: