The piecemeal development of capitalist socioeconomic systems in the colonial Chesapeake was deeply intertwined with projects of white ethnogenesis. Crafting a sense of “groupness” along lines perceived as racial required free “whites” to remain economically and socially interdependent. A variety of strategies and material forms—including reciprocal exchanges, hall‐parlor house plans, and earthfast construction—facilitated this cohesion. Such integrative tactics coexisted in colonists' behavioral repertoires with more “capitalistic” strategies that prioritized private profit over social obligation. Colonists' deployment of diverse social strategies reflects a complex calculus assessing the benefits of economic autonomy against the benefits of ethnic (“white”) solidarity. These dynamics can be illustrated through an 18th‐century archaeological site at Flowerdew Hundred in the Chesapeake.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alison Bell (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: