Animal experiment demonstrates that manganese porphyrins attenuate oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum stress in compressive spinal cord injury, indicating cellular neuroprotective utility.
There is increasing interest in identifying drugs that can prevent or delay neurological complications following spinal cord injury, thus expanding the therapeutic window for other potential neuroprotective agents. In this context, manganese porphyrins (MnPs) have shown high antioxidant and anti-inflammatory potential in various experimental disease models, including stroke, cancer, diabetes, ischemia, and radiotherapy. However, they have been little evaluated in spinal cord injuries. This study aimed to assess the therapeutic potential of the manganese porphyrins [MnTE-2-PyP]5+ (MnPI) and [MnT(5-Br-3-E-Py)P]5+ (MnPII) in acute compressive spinal cord trauma in rats. Twenty-four animals were used (six animals/group). Following general inhalation anesthesia, acute compressive spinal cord trauma was induced in all groups except for the negative control (SHAM). Treatment commenced 60 min post-trauma, with animals receiving treatment for seven days at 24 h intervals. While no improvement in motor capacity was observed, MnPs effectively blocked the increase in oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress mediators caused by trauma, maintaining the protein expression levels of Hifα, 8-OHdG and MDA, as well as the expression of the genes Grp78, Chop, Ho1, and Perk, similar to those of the control group. Moreover, there was an increase in protein expression of SOD1, Cat, and GPX1, along with a restoration of SOD and CAT enzymatic activity. Additionally, MnPs improved the expression of IL-6, neurotrophic markers, and apoptotic factors. In conclusion, treatment with MnPs attenuated the oxidative stress and ER stress caused by acute compressive spinal cord trauma and restored spinal expression of neurotrophic mediators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niella et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: