Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative analysis of language policy highlights English's role in national identity and economic growth in Bangladesh.
Drawing on historical perspectives, this article focuses on the macro-level language policy of Bangladesh. We illustrate how different ideologies and interests shaped the status of the English language within this polity. Taking a qualitative approach, our document analysis revealed three themes which include ‘formation of national identity’, ‘Bengalization’, and ‘liberalization and instrumentalization’. The findings suggest that while ‘formation of national identity’ and ‘Bengalization’ – underpinned by linguistic nationalism – were dominant forces that almost bailed out English from the socio-economic and educational domains, globalization has weakened these forces since the 1990s. In the context of ‘liberalization and instrumentalization’, English has gained a much stronger position as a tool for Bangladesh’s economic development and global competitiveness in a neoliberal world. We argue that analysing macro-political events and underpinning ideologies and interests is critical in understanding how language policy and the position/status of English are shaped by specific historical and political events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoque et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: