Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study investigates the impact of vagal tone on seizure control in a mouse model.
Abstract Background Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an established therapy for refractory epilepsy, indicating that enhanced vagal activity can suppress excessive brain excitability. However, whether endogenous vagal tone itself serves as an intrinsic antiepileptic mechanism remains unclear. We aimed to determine if endogenous vagal activity restrains epileptic dynamics and to elucidate the neural pathways involved. Methods We employed an intrahippocampal kainate-induced mouse model of temporal lobe epilepsy and an optogenetic model of hippocampal excitability. We performed gain-of-function studies using cervical VNS (30 Hz) and loss-of-function studies using bilateral subdiaphragmatic vagotomy and selective ablation of VGluT2-positive vagal afferents. Results Cervical VNS attenuated network hyperexcitability, significantly reducing delta power and root mean square (RMS) amplitude, consistent with its clinical efficacy. By contrast, bilateral subdiaphragmatic vagotomy increased delta power, RMS amplitude, and mortality, demonstrating that endogenous vagal activity restrains epileptic dynamics. In the optogenetic model, VNS suppressed, whereas vagotomy exacerbated, light-evoked after-discharges. Crucially, selective ablation of VGluT2-positive vagal afferents largely abolished the electrophysiological signatures of VNS, including power suppression and network desynchronization, establishing that the antiseizure action of VNS depends on intact afferent pathways. Conclusions These findings identify endogenous vagal afferent signaling as a tonic brake on epileptic network activity and provide mechanistic evidence that cervical VNS suppresses seizures by amplifying this endogenous pathway. This work presents a conceptual and mechanistic framework for afferent-targeted neuromodulation strategies aimed at improving therapeutic precision in epilepsy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sayanagi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: