Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review finds non-handlers contribute to DNA mixture inversion, suggesting implications for evidence interpretation.
Abstract This study presents the first systematic review examining the prevalence of DNA mixture inversion, defined as the occurrence of a major contributor to a DNA profile generated through indirect transfer via an intermediary individual. Following PRISMA guidelines, 45 empirical studies published between 1997 and 2022 were identified as containing relevant data to assess the prevalence of mixture inversion. Analysis of these studies, encompassing 3,851 samples, showed that mixture inversion occurred in 1.69% of samples, consistent with previous reports. No significant differences were observed across substrate types. However, handlers classified as low shedders exhibited a higher frequency of mixture inversion compared to intermediate or high shedders. Mixture inversion was more likely following brief handling durations (<30seconds) and when handlers had not recently washed their hands. These findings demonstrate that although mixture inversion is relatively uncommon, it may have important implications for interpreting DNA evidence at the activity level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roebuck et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: